The China Game

Geopolitics steps up again — China successfully tested an anti-satellite weapon by shooting down one of their own old weather satellites. If you go back to the latest National Space Policy, [old post] you’ll see whence all the emphasis on protecting US “freedom of action in space:” the US and China both see this as a major new battleground for geopolitical-scale military superiority.

There’s a much broader game going on, of course. China has worked out a systematic policy of recruiting any states that don’t get along with the US, e.g. African dictatorships that the US won’t deal with because of extensive corruption, and turning them into client states, with extensive Chinese investment (under very strict Chinese control; they don’t care if they have to bribe some locals, but then they get to run the show themselves) turning into a steady supply of raw materials for China. It also means that embargoes are trivially broken; if the Western coalition embargoes someone, they just start working with China instead. Iran being a key example: they’re building oil pipelines out to Beijing now, with China giving Iran full cover for its nuke program. (Also nice for China since Pakistan is an increasingly weak and flaky ally, and at perpetual risk for coup)

Note, BTW, that North Korea’s continued existence is determined by China. The DPRK gets to keep running in their own peculiar madhouse way, and sell advanced missile and nuclear technology to anyone within the Chinese “family.” It’s a way they can provide somewhat sleazy benefits to their closer partners while providing plausible deniability.

Update: More details from the Washington Post.

Published in: on January 18, 2007 at 11:41  Comments (4)  
Tags:

Your unreassuring headline for the day

From the Washington Post: “Secret Panel to Govern Domestic Wiretapping.”

You know, in any normal sort of world, that headline would be rather alarming. But it actually represents a significant improvement from the situation a day ago, where domestic wiretapping was governed by the personal fiat of various individuals in the Departments of Justice, Defense, and Homeland Security.

Not to say that I believe that those three organizations will miraculously stop all wiretaps (and other forms of surveillance, both focused and broad-spectrum) that are not governed by the FISC.

Published in: on January 17, 2007 at 17:19  Comments Off on Your unreassuring headline for the day  
Tags: , ,

Sigh.

The story is going around the blogs that Robert Anton Wilson passed away. For those who haven’t heard of him, he was a writer who wrote some truly bizarre shit, as well as some philosophy and so on which turned out to be surprisingly deep. Hell of a sense of humor. Real impact on me when I was younger. Probably still to this day.

Anyway, this just makes me think of the time about ten years ago when a rumor started going around that he was dead; he even had obits showing up in newspapers. It took years to get it fully straightened out that no, in fact, he was still alive. So there’s part of me that secretly wonders if he’s going to come back from the dead this time, too. Another part of me realizes that this is pretty Messianic thinking… but if this world is going to get hit with a messiah, I suppose it could do a hell of a lot worse.

(The part of me that’s a good Jew is wondering about why other parts of me describe the coming of the messiah as something that the world could get hit by, rather than something that “I look forward to… with perfect faith, though he may tarry.” The part of me that knows history thinks that “inflict” is a pretty good verb to use with “messiah.” The part of me that’s watching this many parts of me yell at each other thinks that RAW would find that pretty appropriate.)

Published in: on January 11, 2007 at 12:48  Comments (10)  

Random quote

From a decision of the Supreme Court today, in MedImmune v. Genentech:

The rule that a plaintiff must destroy a large building, bet the farm, or (as here) risk treble damages and the loss of 80 percent of its business, before seeking a declaration of its actively contested legal rights finds no support in Article III.

There really is a context in which that makes perfect sense, and no, the plaintiffs are not (AFAIK) a barbarian horde.

Published in: on January 10, 2007 at 18:12  Comments (18)  
Tags:

Your headline for the day

From the Washington Post:

Bush Urges Troop ‘Surge’ in Iraq: President says al-Maliki’s willingness to commit forces against Shiite militias ensures success.

This time, for sure!

Published in: on January 9, 2007 at 10:39  Comments (2)  
Tags:

Non-suck resumés

I’ve spent a lot of time in the past few years reading resumés and interviewing people. A really surprising fraction of those resumés have been really lousy; either uninformative, or full of meaningless junk, or just plain illegible. I tend to throw those out. On the other hand, good interviews with competent people leave me in a better mood all day… so in the interest of getting more of those in the future, I’m going to post a couple of notes on good versus bad resumés. (OK, to be honest: In the interest of not having to slog through any more piles of really bad resumés. It makes me feel like my brains are going to leak out of my ears.)

(more…)

Published in: on November 17, 2006 at 14:23  Comments (42)  
Tags:

Ah yes, one more thing…

Trent Lott (R-MS) just got chosen to be minority whip. He’s the former majority leader who stepped down in 2003 after a bit of a fuss over his remarks at Strom Thurmond’s 100th birthday party. Just so nobody forgets, his exact words were:

“I want to say this about my state — when Strom Thurmond ran for president, we voted for him. We’re proud of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn’t have had all these problems over the years, either.”

To clarify: Strom Thurmond ran for president in 1948 with the short-lived Dixiecrat party. This party formed when, at the 1948 Democratic convention, the party decided to put an anti-segregation plank into their platform; a coalition of 35 delegates stormed out and promptly formed the “States’ Rights Democratic Party,” more commonly known as the Dixiecrats, and ran their own candidate – Thurmond – on a strong pro-segregation platform. To quote him from this election,

“I wanna tell you, ladies and gentlemen, that there’s not enough troops in the army to force the Southern people to break down segregation and admit the nigra race into our theaters, into our swimming pools, into our homes, and into our churches.”

After this party collapsed, he switched to the Republicans, who had swept up control of the South basically by opposing the Democrats on desegregation.1

In his favor, Thurmond changed his mind — by the 1970’s, he repudiated segregation and ultimately did things like support black candidates for federal judgeships, something that Southern politicians of the day were loathe to do. Trent Lott, on the other hand, apparently never did.

So when you start hearing about how the Republican party just chose this guy to be their whip, because they need a good legislative tactician (and he certainly is that), just remember what they’re in bed with.

1 There’s a whole fascinating story here, about the political realignment in the late 40’s that basically reshaped American politics; and I didn’t hear word one about it until I took a fairly specialized course on the history of the American presidency in college. Amazing, what they don’t tell you in school.

Published in: on November 15, 2006 at 18:37  Comments (14)  
Tags:

Random tidbits

Newsweek and the Washington Post are hosting a dialogue on the subject of faith and the possibility of coexistence between religions. Contributors so far include the Dalai Lama and Mohammad Khatami. Interesting to hear them speak, and to see people’s responses.

There has been significant progress towards sequencing Neanderthal DNA, and there are hopes of having an almost complete sequence in a year or so. This opens all kinds of doors to looking at what, genetically, makes us human.

On a related note, Slate is running an article about cross-species mating, and in particular why humans could or could not breed with other species. (This was prompted by a recent paper suggesting that humans and Neanderthals may have mated, and that’s the origin of some of our modern cranial capacity genes)

Back in the land of geopolitics, a Chinese sub managed to sneak up on a US carrier group. Apart from ‘s comment that someone O4+ is going to be in seriously deep shit over this, this suggests that they’ve been doing quite well on the technology needed to make highly silent motors and so on. (Whether they did so on their own or “acquired” this technology from elsewhere is an interesting question. China’s military has certainly never suffered from not-invented-here syndrome.)

There’s really a lot having to do with China going on right now. China and Iran are cementing an alliance, with Iranian oil getting ready to flow east. (Question: Anyone have some info as to what the routes are going to be? It looks like every possible path is going to involve some combination of Pakistan, Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Kazakhstan, which could make for some very exciting places to put oil pipelines. Don’t forget what happened to Russia’s Caspian -> Turkey pipeline, that once upon a time went through Chechnya…) Iran may well have had observers at N Korea’s nuclear test. (Unconfirmed rumors, but wouldn’t be all that surprising if true; those countries have been working hand-in-hand on this for a while.) China is similarly making alliances with a lot of other dubious places that have useful resources, like the Sudan and Zimbabwe, but that the West by and large wants nothing to do with. This certainly makes the notion of sanctions as a weapon pretty much infeasible, since that depends on some sort of unity, and could bring us back towards a bipolar world — if, that is, China’s “burn through the environment as fast as needed to get economic progress” algorithm doesn’t hit a really nasty obstacle in the near future. Which is not something that I would bet against. (Side note: They’re burning through this a lot faster than the US or Europe ever did, because they have a much higher population, and they have old systems in place which turn into a huge social unrest risk if they don’t keep the economy flowing. Add to this an almost total willingness to sacrifice the countryside to protect the cities, again because of unrest risk, and there’s a real problem brewing in China. Not that this would be useful to the furthering of US interests or anything.)

Really, China is in an interesting fix. They got where they are today by being the cheapest producer of all sorts of things. Now other Asian countries, especially in SE Asia, are thinking about competing with them; so what will China do? Keep trying to undercut them, or move into higher-end markets? The latter is more sustainable in general, but it doesn’t necessarily scale to a huge population quite as smoothly, and China has been moving so fast that it hasn’t really had time to transfer the benefits from its previous wave of growth to the population as a whole, so the moderating factor that that would create isn’t available. And trouble from the countryside, local riots, complete collapses of regions due to ecosystem failure, and so on, keep happening more and more often, while people keep streaming into already-overloaded cities. It reminds me a bit of the USSR: it looks awfully menacing on the outside, but if you look at their underlying logistics and infrastructure, there’s a very different thing going on.

Dammit, I’m not nearly enough of a China expert. Perhaps I’m going to need to start on that.

Published in: on November 15, 2006 at 16:10  Comments (2)  
Tags: , ,

The Military Commissions Act in action

Read this.

The Central Intelligence Agency and the Justice Department have told a federal court that permitting lawyers access to high-level Qaeda suspects without tighter secrecy procedures could damage national security by revealing harsh “alternative interrogation methods” used in secret C.I.A. prisons overseas. … “Nobody is trying to keep Khan from speaking with his attorney,” [Justice Department spokesman] Blomquist said. “Rather, the government is asking that the protective order governing the information the detainee shares with his counsel be appropriately tailored to accommodate a higher security level.”

Which is to say: Not only can high-value suspects (or other suspects? Who decides again?) be tortured, but the simple fact that they are tortured is secret, and cannot be examined either in court or even be considered by their attorneys to determine whether there is a matter which can be challenged in court.
In case you were still wondering about the legitimacy of this “Military Commissions Act,” here is your case in point. A person was held by CIA, by implicit admission tortured, and not only can they not raise this in court as an argument against the validity of any confessions thereby extracted, but they may not even discuss the matter with counsel. The government is claiming the unilateral right to tell the suspect that he may not discuss a wide range of issues with his own lawyer, much less with a judge or the military commission which this act describes as a fair trial.
Every procedural safeguard is removed, with torture being effectively permitted without restriction (since any restriction on it may not, by law, ever be actually pressed!) and suspects – which, as we have seen, are falsely accused as often as not – are left to the tender mercies of the CIA and their “agents.” This is the legacy of our president, ימח שמו.

Published in: on November 5, 2006 at 22:18  Comments (6)  
Tags: ,

Silly buggers

For those of you who haven’t seen this, the Rev. Ted Haggard, a prominent conservative leader, (and who was prominently featured in the recent documentary Jesus Camp, btw) recently resigned after admitting to the at least partial truth of allegations that he’s been popping meth and screwing male prostitutes. But he qualified his admission:

One of the nation’s most influential conservative Christian leaders, the Rev. Ted Haggard, said today he bought methamphetamine and received a massage from a self-described male escort. But Haggard denied allegations by the man that he ever used the drug or had sex with him.

You know, this makes me miss straightforward bullshit like “I didn’t inhale!”

(Incidentally — this story is prompting so much amusement in no small part because, what a shock, the Rev. Haggard spends a lot of time preaching against homosexuals. Until a few days ago, he was one of the up-and-coming powers of the religious right wing. Hey, with habits like these, maybe he should run for Congress…)

Published in: on November 3, 2006 at 14:53  Comments (13)  
Tags: ,