Who’s next?

Secretary-general Hassan Rohani of Iran’s National Security Council (a group affiliated with the ayatollahs rather than the reformers, for those of you keeping score) issued a statement urging the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to end its investigation and “accept Iran’s membership of the atomic club.”

His statement further explained that Iran’s nuclear program is purely aimed at civilian nuclear power, and their advanced centrifuges and the discovery of 80% enriched Uranium by IAEA inspectors* was ignored.

English translation: Iran’s nuclear program is farther along than most estimates, especially after their little deal with North Korea (and thus indirectly, Pakistan) to trade workspace for technology; they’re not confident in having a bomb testable within a year, though, so they want to institute some medium- to long-term delays for the IAEA. (Rather than the more direct obstreprious stonewalling that they would use if they just wanted to keep the IAEA busy for a few more months)

But their technology is good, so expect to see Iran enter the nuclear club (barring unforeseen circumstances, which is a hell of a “barring”) somtime between now and 2007. The ayatollahs would like that to be earlier, the reformers could work with either early or late. Iranian internal politics may have an order-1 effect on all of this.

Just remember, kids – nuclear weapons don’t kill people, people kill people. Erm. With nuclear weapons.

Published in: on March 7, 2004 at 15:25  Comments (1)  
Tags:

Gay marriage

An interesting editorial by Jonathan Rauch on the subject of gay marriage.

Published in: on March 7, 2004 at 14:28  Comments Off on Gay marriage  
Tags:

Protected: Exploratorium-P?

This content is password-protected. To view it, please enter the password below.

Published in: on March 6, 2004 at 15:56  Enter your password to view comments.  

No matter how many computers you happen to have, the absolute minimum you need in order to get your work done is at least 50% greater.

I can confirm that this law continues to scale quite effectively over several orders of magnitude. I cannot (publicly) confirm precisely how many.

Published in: on March 4, 2004 at 11:37  Comments (5)  
Tags:

Your picture of the day…

Picture from The Onion, 2/25/2004

Edit: I’m somewhat amused that so far three people have independently come up with the same caption…

Published in: on February 28, 2004 at 01:40  Comments (2)  

Protected: Another long night…

This content is password-protected. To view it, please enter the password below.

Published in: on February 27, 2004 at 02:10  Enter your password to view comments.  

A random amusement for your evening

A new penguin-bapping game. This one is essentially indirect-fire penguin darts. It involves a yeti and an orca.

Published in: on February 19, 2004 at 19:40  Comments (4)  

Things you learn…

One of my favorite Jack Chick tracts. (For those of you not familiar with these, they’re… shall we say… very Christian little pamphlets that evangelists hand out on street corners. This one in particular is about evolution, and why it’s obviously incorrect and against all religious law)

According to this tract, quantum chromodynamics is a lie, gluons do not exist, and strongly interacting particles are held together by the direct force of divine intervention. (Which is, apparently, somehow distinguishable from gluons. Maybe it has different scattering properties or something.)

That’s going to be a very busy personal divinity. There are a lot of baryons in this universe.

I think I’m going to have to start using the phrase “As busy as the Holy Ghost during baryogenesis.”

Published in: on February 16, 2004 at 01:04  Comments (6)  
Tags: , ,

The civil law, Part II: Gay marriage

A previous post discussed the general notion of civil law and why I believe it to be the foundation of the American legal system and a general good thing. I’d like now to continue with a series of posts in the next few days trying to apply this principle directly to some contentious issues today.
Subject 1: Gay marriage

Published in: on February 15, 2004 at 16:40  Comments (7)  
Tags:

On the civil law, Part 1: General issues.

In the past few months, I’ve heard the issue of gay marriage being debated on a number of fronts, like “civil rights,” “the sanctity of the institution,” and so on. But on thinking about it, I’ve realized that there’s a separate issue involved: The existence of civil law. Since this seems to have implications substantially beyond this one issue, I thought I’d put some notes about it here.

This first part is of a general nature: It’s about the whole idea of civil law and why it’s important. Part 2 will talk about the applications of this idea to specific political issues.
(more…)

Published in: on February 15, 2004 at 15:52  Comments (7)  
Tags: